In particular, you'll notice the biggest difference with reds and greens, or even colors that occupy a similar spot on the spectrum, like orange. (Notebook displays don't get much brighter than that.) Apple also promises a higher contrast ratio and a 25 percent wider color gamut that now includes the P3 color space - an important spec for photographers, videographers and other creative professionals.Īs I said in my review of the current iMac, which also supports the P3 color gamut, you might not notice the difference in color on your own, but once someone points it out for you, it can be hard to un-see. (Ditto for the 15.4-inch screen, with a resolution of 2,880 x 1,800.) What has changed is the quality of the screen: It's 67 percent brighter this year, with a max brightness rating of 500 nits. (I don't miss it, to be honest.) The keyboard has the same flat buttons as on the smaller MacBook, and the glass Force Touch trackpad is exactly what you're used to, just a lot bigger this time.Īlso familiar is the Retina display, whose 13.3-inch size and 2,560 x 1,600 resolution haven't changed from last year's MacBook Pro. As on the smaller MacBook, there's a metal logo on the lid where the glowing Apple used to be. Like its stablemate, the new Pro has a unibody aluminum chassis, available in silver and space gray - a first for the Pro series. The new MacBook Pro is a clear departure from the previous generation, but it does look an awful lot like the more recent 12-inch MacBook. Factor in a narrower selection of ports (almost guaranteeing you'll need a dongle) and the MacBook Pro isn't just a thinner or different-looking Mac it's one you're meant to use differently. Most notably, they mark the debut of yet another newfangled thing: the "Touch Bar," an OLED strip above the keyboard that replaces the age-old Function bar with touch-sensitive controls that change depending on the app you're using. Both of the new 13- and 15-inch Pros are thinner, lighter and more compact than their predecessors, with faster graphics and disk performance, a brighter, more colorful screen, Touch ID fingerprint sensor and louder, clearer audio. Thanks to that stale design and often neglected internals, many Mac fans out there have delayed upgrading - surely a new model was just around the corner, right? Though we're not sure you all were able to hold off until now, Apple has finally updated its MacBook Pro line, and it's not just a processor refresh either. Though Apple has occasionally refreshed the processors (the last time being all the way back in early 2015), that design from 2012 is virtually the same one we've been reviewing all these years. It weighed 4.46 pounds (a heavyweight by today's standards) and it ushered in some newfangled thing called the Retina display. Sorry I'm a brand new Mac user coming over from PC and am having a hard time understanding how a dual core, 4GB RAM device could have much higher read and write scores.The last time Engadget reviewed a brand-new MacBook Pro design was in June of 2012. What exactly is this measuring? Does this mean her Macbook is that much faster than mine? I've seen new Macbook Pro's hitting over 1600 Mb/s so I'm wondering if these computers are really 2-4 times faster at working with audio/video production. My gf on the other hand has an early 2015 Macbook Air (1.6 Ghz dual core, 4gb RAM, 128 GB flash storage) and her Blackmagic results show over 1000 Mb/s on read and write. (Some RAID 0 setups have speeds around 900 Mb/s from what I've seen on youtube as well) This seems on par with most youtube video results who have a similar setup after upgrading their Mid-2012 MacBook Pro. It feels blazing fast and my Blackmagic disk speed test results measure around 400-450 Mb/s for both read and write. So I recently bought a Mid-2012 MacBook Pro (2.6 Ghz quad-quad core) that was maxed out with an SSD and 16GB of Ram.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |